Hindustan Times ·
CRPF officer files complaint over alleged mistreatment of women protesters by Delhi police, CAPF
By Prawesh Lama||3 min read at Hindustan Times
Model summary
not written by Hindustan Times · not verifiedGenerated October 13, 2026
- A CRPF officer has filed a complaint with human rights and women's commissions, requesting an investigation into alleged mistreatment of women protesters by police and CAPF personnel. The complaint follows broader reports of police manhandling women and journalists during recent protests in Delhi. The officer has called for an impartial inquiry, forensic verification of viral videos, and improved gender sensitivity training for security forces.
This is an AI-estimated analysis and may not reflect the article's actual intent or the publisher's editorial position.
Sign in to give feedbackA serving Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) officer posted in Manipur filed a complaint with the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC), Delhi police and National Commission for Women(NCW) seeking action against Central Armed Police Force (CAPF) and Delhi police “personnel physically women protesters.” Assistant commandant Rahul Solanki said in his complaint that he was submitting it in his personal capacity as a “concerned citizen”.
Solanki attached three links to videos from social media which, he said, prima facie show police and CAPF personnel physically mistreating women.
That is the opening of Hindustan Times’s story. The full report is on their site.
Read the full story at Hindustan Times (opens in a new tab)Related Stories
Deccan Herald ·
Pushed, dragged, manhandled: A photojournalist's account of police excesses during SIR protest in Bengaluru
Eenadu ·
పోలీసులపై దాడి.. 20 మంది అరెస్ట్
The Hindu ·
Bay trough may bring rain, relief from heat in Telangana
Andhra Jyothy ·
Drought: కరువు కోరల్లో జిల్లా
How this was analysed
Read by a model across 13 sources.
Confidence: High
Blind ReadEvery figure on this page is an estimate produced by a model reading this article’s own sentences, and each one is published with what it was measured from. Where we could not measure something confidently, the number is left out rather than rounded into one.
Scored by gemini-3.1-flash-lite under the Standard v1 rubric, with the publisher's identity removed. How this works →
How we measure coverage