Deccan Herald ·
KPSC row: Supreme Court stays Karnataka HC's order for setting up SIT to probe scam
By Ashish Tripathi||3 min read at Deccan Herald
Model summary
not written by Deccan Herald · not verifiedGenerated October 1, 2026
- The Supreme Court has stayed a Karnataka High Court order that sought to establish a Special Investigation Team to conduct a fresh probe into the KPSC recruitment scam. The state government argued that the High Court's directive lacked findings of bias against existing investigative bodies and threatened the validity of evidence already collected.
This is an AI-estimated analysis and may not reflect the article's actual intent or the publisher's editorial position.
Sign in to give feedbackNew Delhi: The Supreme Court on Thursday stayed the Karnataka High Court's order September 21, 2026 order directing for setting up an SIT to conduct a de novo investigation into the KPSC recruitment .
A bench of Justices Manoj Misra and Vijay Bishnoi passed the order upon hearing senior advocates Kapil Sibal and Sidharth Luthra and Karnataka's Additional Advocate General Nishanth Patil.
That is the opening of Deccan Herald’s story. The full report is on their site.
Read the full story at Deccan Herald (opens in a new tab)Related Stories
India Today ·
Calcutta High Court orders CBI to probe RG Kar cremation evidence case
Deccan Herald ·
'Vijay, Jagannath, Yashodha' under scanner: Shivakumar says 'BJP workers' filed thousands of voter deletion forms in 2 days
Hindustan Times ·
Gujarat govt compulsorily retires two IAS officers under ‘Operation Gangajal’
Hindustan Times ·
Maharashtra makes Aadhaar mandatory for immovable property registration from October 1
Deccan Herald ·
Bengaluru: Namma Metro's elevated Pink Line set for safety inspection from October 6-8
How this was analysed
Read by a model across 1 source.
Confidence: High
Blind ReadEvery figure on this page is an estimate produced by a model reading this article’s own sentences, and each one is published with what it was measured from. Where we could not measure something confidently, the number is left out rather than rounded into one.
Scored by gemini-3.1-flash-lite under the Standard v1 rubric, with the publisher's identity removed. How this works →
How we measure coverage