Deccan Herald ·
'Vijay, Jagannath, Yashodha' under scanner: Shivakumar says 'BJP workers' filed thousands of voter deletion forms in 2 days
By Bharath Joshi||2 min read at Deccan Herald
Model summary
not written by Deccan Herald · not verifiedGenerated October 1, 2026
- Karnataka Deputy Chief Minister DK Shivakumar has accused BJP workers of orchestrating a mass voter deletion conspiracy by submitting thousands of pre-printed Form-7 applications across various constituencies. The state government claims that specific individuals have filed these applications targeting minority and marginalized communities, and has announced a police investigation into the matter.
This is an AI-estimated analysis and may not reflect the article's actual intent or the publisher's editorial position.
Sign in to give feedbackBengaluru: Seven persons, whom the Congress government identified as BJP workers, submitted at least 13,000 Form-7 applications in just two days - September 22 and 23 -- seeking deletion of voters in the Bijapur City constituency.
In the Bhalki constituency of Bidar district, there were 3,244 Form-7 applications submitted by 36 BJP workers, the government claimed. Of them, one BJP worker identified as Jagannath filed 241 applications on a single day.
That is the opening of Deccan Herald’s story. The full report is on their site.
Read the full story at Deccan Herald (opens in a new tab)Related Stories
Deccan Herald ·
KPSC row: Supreme Court stays Karnataka HC's order for setting up SIT to probe scam
Hindustan Times ·
Maharashtra makes Aadhaar mandatory for immovable property registration from October 1
Hindustan Times ·
Gujarat govt compulsorily retires two IAS officers under ‘Operation Gangajal’
Deccan Herald ·
Bengaluru: Namma Metro's elevated Pink Line set for safety inspection from October 6-8
Namasthe Telangana ·
గోదావరి కరకట్ట సర్వేను అడ్డుకున్న కొల్లుచెరువు సొసైటీ సభ్యులు
How this was analysed
Read by a model across 1 source.
Confidence: High
Blind ReadEvery figure on this page is an estimate produced by a model reading this article’s own sentences, and each one is published with what it was measured from. Where we could not measure something confidently, the number is left out rather than rounded into one.
Scored by gemini-3.1-flash-lite under the Standard v1 rubric, with the publisher's identity removed. How this works →
How we measure coverage