Skip to content
Set place— choose your constituency

The Guardian ·

You Can See Everything review – Nathan Fielder’s Elizabeth Holmes doc is a modern masterpiece of deceit

By https://www.theguardian.com/profile/adrian-horton||5 min read at The Guardian

Model summary

not written by The Guardian · not verified

Generated October 1, 2026

  • The review praises the documentary 'You Can See Everything' as a masterclass in psychological tension and artistic execution. Directed by Nathan Fielder and Lance Oppenheim, the film explores the life of convicted fraudster Elizabeth Holmes and her husband, Billy Evans, resulting in an unpredictable and revealing cinematic experience.

This is an AI-estimated analysis and may not reflect the article's actual intent or the publisher's editorial position.

Sign in to give feedback

Reader mode

No spoilers here – TV’s grand illusionist meets his match when he moves in with Theranos founder and her family

For anyone remotely near the worlds of documentary, comedy or medical fraud, there has been one thing on the mind for weeks now: a single-minute clip of Nathan Fielder, the absurdist comedian whose boundary-pushing HBO series The Rehearsal cemented his status as docu-reality’s premier auteur, staring into the deep blue eyes of Elizabeth Holmes, the of the blood-testing startup Theranos. Unblinking, faces inches apart, the famously dry purveyor of harebrained business schemes and the appeared locked in a battle of wills. “Are you being real right now?”…

That is the opening of The Guardian’s story. The full report is on their site.

Read the full story at The Guardian (opens in a new tab)

Related Stories

How this was analysed

Read by a model across 1 source.

Confidence: High

Blind Read

Every figure on this page is an estimate produced by a model reading this article’s own sentences, and each one is published with what it was measured from. Where we could not measure something confidently, the number is left out rather than rounded into one.

Scored by gemini-3.1-flash-lite under the Standard v1 rubric, with the publisher's identity removed. How this works →

How we measure coverage